Just be careful. I know you have used it for 5 years, but one downhill mishap could kill you. I've seen more than one person get run over by their trailer. It ain't pretty.Is there anyone else using your grizzly to pull a log trailer?
I found just opposite, my engine brake on my 700 kodiak holds back a heavy trailer way better than first gear on my 450 honda foreman with manual trans. The old Honda wood do good until it was a steep long hill then it would get reving too high and have to start locking up the brakes, the kodiak engine brake holds the load nicelyI used to get about 4 cords of firewood every year with a Mountain Goat walking beam trailer. I used my Grizzly 700 a couple times, but went back to my Suzuki Vinson because it worked much better going downhill with a heavy load because of the manual transmission. I could put it in low and it would crawl down the hills, where the cvt would continue to pick up speed.
I have rode just about every model ever available (a friend has a big dealership with test trail), and Yamaha's engine braking is by far the best. A strange thing is when I use non-ethanol 89, there is less engine braking than if I use normal 87. Not a big difference, but I notice it right away. Even at that, no other machine can compare with Yamaha's system. I think it has everything to do with the octane rating rather than the lack of ethanol. Non-ethanol is still the way to go.I found just opposite, my engine brake on my 700 kodiak holds back a heavy trailer way better than first gear on my 450 honda foreman with manual trans.
My nephew's neighbor has a hydrolic asisted trailer like that, and yes it will hold back a loaded trailer provided the tires don't start to slide. He crushed his little 300 Polaris out on his woodlot that way, trail was holding back well, limited the wheel rotation but once he got to a little mossy area, the tires started to slide, and once traction was broken like that, weight and gravity took over. He started sliding down the hill, he bailed, and the bike hit a tree , and the loaded trailer jack knifed and the logs just mangled his little bike. He replaced it with a 500 rubicon.Not sure if those hydraulic rear drives on those trailers helps with holding it back enough to go down steep hills with a load on.
Oh i definitely agree about the superior engine brake on the yamaha, it's miles ahead of the competition. It really has imprrssed me.I have rode just about every model ever available (a friend has a big dealership with test trail), and Yamaha's engine braking is by far the best. A strange thing is when I use non-ethanol 89, there is less engine braking than if I use normal 87. Not a big difference, but I notice it right away. Even at that, no other machine can compare with Yamaha's system. I think it has everything to do with the octane rating rather than the lack of ethanol. Non-ethanol is still the way to go.
He's very lucky, the guy is around 70 years old, so prob about 68 when this accident happened. He goes out and logs with his bike everyday just to keep busy.That sucks, but he's lucky. I saw a faceplant with no time to bail. The trailer ran over everything. That's why I chime in to every trailer pulling post. Information is a good thing.
No offense taken. Most people may not notice the difference, but I can feel it. It's not a big difference, probably 95% won't notice it, but it's there. I was in the US Coast Guard. I have 'small boat in high seas' sea-legs. I feel every little thing. That's not a great thing. I have tried and tried to get used to riding without the anti-sway bar, because its so much better in the rocks, but I can feel the inconsequential body roll even on straightaways. At my speeds, it's harmless, few would notice it, but it drives me crazy.Oh i definitely agree about the superior engine brake on the yamaha, it's miles ahead of the competition. It really has imprrssed me.